Kyte Baby Denies NICU Mom Remote Work: Can They Do That?

Kyte Baby Denies NICU Mom Remote Work: Can They Do That?

Marissa and Rawley Hughes, a couple from Dallas, found themselves in a challenging situation when their prematurely born son required care in a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) nine hours away from home. As Marissa, an employee of Kyte Baby, sought to balance work and caring for her newborn, she faced a setback when the company declined her request to work remotely.

Kyte Baby, a baby clothing brand, is now facing backlash and a potential customer boycott over this decision. The controversy arose when Marissa, who had previously disclosed her adoption plans to Kyte Baby in October, found herself in a difficult situation after receiving the call about the premature baby in December. The couple, who had struggled with their own fertility issues, decided to pursue adoption and created a GoFundMe page to help cover the adoption fees.

In a TikTok video that garnered half a million views, Marissa’s sister highlighted the situation, criticizing Kyte Baby for denying Marissa the opportunity to work remotely while caring for her 22-week-old son, Judah, who weighed only 1 pound at birth.

Recent Buzz : Griselda Blanco vs. Sofia Vergara: Drug Lord Family Sues Netflix Over Miniseries

Despite Kyte Baby providing two weeks of paid leave, Marissa’s subsequent request to work remotely from the NICU was denied, leading to public outcry. Kyte Baby’s CEO, Ying Lui, clarified that, based on the company’s maternity policy at the time, all parents—whether biological or non-biological—who had worked for the company for at least six months were entitled to two weeks of paid maternity leave.

Apologizing for the handling of Marissa’s maternity leave, Lui expressed regret to both Marissa and the broader Kyte Baby community. The incident has sparked controversy, prompting discussions around parental support in the workplace and drawing attention to the challenges faced by working parents, especially in unique and emotionally demanding situations like caring for a premature baby in the NICU.

Out of a job

Despite having worked for Kyte Baby for seven months, Marissa Hughes found herself in a difficult position, pleading with the company to reconsider its decision as she was nine hours away, caring for her sick newborn in the hospital, and the prognosis indicated that the baby might not be released until March or April.

In the midst of this challenging situation, Hughes, as reported by her sister, was informed by the company that she would be jeopardizing her job if she chose to stay at the hospital. Undeterred by the ultimatum, Hughes made the decision to stay with her fragile newborn, expressing on the GoFundMe page that he remained in a delicate state with various health concerns.

Despite efforts to reach out for further comment, Hughes has not responded to USA TODAY’s requests.

In defense of their decision, Kyte Baby pointed out that Hughes had previously signed a contract agreeing to the company’s policy. This development further intensifies the ongoing discussion surrounding employment policies, especially when they intersect with personal and challenging circumstances faced by employees.

Work-from-hospital denial sets off firestorm

The story of Marissa Hughes and Kyte Baby has gone viral, sparking widespread outrage on the internet. Many individuals are expressing their solidarity with Hughes and vowing to boycott Kyte Baby in response to the company’s decision.

Source:USA Today

In a TikTok video that has garnered nearly two million views since being posted on Wednesday, Maura Powers passionately stated, “I will never give Kyte Baby another dime of my money, and I would encourage you to do the same.” Powers, who is both adopted and a mom, emphasized how the situation made her feel physically sick.

One user shared her own experience, highlighting that she was hired by her company when she was six months pregnant and still received up to 12 weeks of maternity leave. This user criticized Kyte Baby, stating, “No excuse for this type of treatment.”

Others in the online community are urging people to redirect their support to small businesses and those that prioritize the well-being and support of mothers. The incident is serving as a catalyst for discussions about corporate responsibility, maternity leave policies, and the treatment of employees during challenging personal circumstances. As the boycott gains momentum, Kyte Baby may face lasting consequences for its handling of this situation.

About Author

Emily Johnson

Meet Emily Johnson, a rising star in the world of news reporting. Armed with a Communications degree from Harvard University, Emily's writing is a perfect blend of creativity and fact-based journalism. She specializes in human-interest stories, bringing the personal touch that makes every story relatable. Whether it's heartwarming tales or societal issues, Emily is your guide to the trending news you won't want to miss.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *